2013年考研英語一答案？12.【答案】C【解析】此外明顯缺一個過去分詞作interviews的定語,再看by后面的officers,只有conducted(執行),符合語境,故為正確答案。那么，2013年考研英語一答案？一起來了解一下吧。
這個句子主干部分為people will only start shopping moe sustainabl...，從句為when 引導的條件狀語從句，該從句為省略句，not to 后省略了主句中的shop more substainably. can't afford not to 兩個not ，雙重否定。
翻譯為：只有當人們支付不起不能消費的的時候，才會進行可持續消費。
text1
在 2006年的電影《穿普拉達的女魔頭》中，梅麗爾·斯特里普扮演的米蘭達?普瑞斯特利指責她那毫無吸引 力的助理認為高級時裝并未感染到她。Priestly解釋了這些年來，助理毛衫的那種深藍色是如何從時尚秀場走向 百貨商店，又走向廉價服裝店的，無疑，這個窮女孩的衣服就是在那兒買的。
時尚業這種自上而下的概念已經過時了，與伊麗莎白·克萊恩在《過分打扮》一書中所描繪的狂熱世界存 在著差異。這本書是她長達三年對“快速時尚”的控訴。近十年的時間中，技術進步使得大規模市場品牌，如 Zara, H&M 和優衣庫等對于潮流趨勢的反應更加速度，并且能更精確預測市場需求。快速的轉變意味著浪費的 庫存減少了，新品發布更加頻繁，并且能獲得更大的利潤。這些品牌鼓勵那些有時尚意識的顧客們將服裝視作 是一次性的——也就是只洗一兩次就不要了，盡管這些品牌并未宣傳這一點——并且鼓勵他們每隔幾周就更新 自己的衣柜。通過提供非常便宜的時尚單品，克萊恩認為，這些品牌掠奪了時尚圈，撼動了這個早就適應了季 節性周期的行業。
這次革新的受害者們，當然，不僅僅限于設計師們。對 H&M 來說，要在全球 2300多家店里銷售價格 5.95 美元的針織迷你裙，它必須依賴于低廉的海外勞動力，必須成批大量訂購，而這使得自然資源緊張，并且使用 數量眾多的有害化學品。
根據查詢中國研究生招生信息網得知，拿督適中。
2013年考研英語一的難度整體適中，閱讀部分第一篇和第四篇難度稍大。從閱讀來看，文章比較新穎，主要來源于2012年的報刊雜志，如《經濟學人》和《華爾街日報》，文章內容比較新穎，特別是第一篇關于時尚的文章，出現了大家耳熟能詳的商業品牌。
answer to
1.
(對刺激)起反應，對…有反應；響應；產生做用(或效果):
The cow answered to its cowboy's touch.
牛對牛仔的輕擊做出了反應。
2.
對(…的稱呼)做出反應；名叫，叫做：
The child answers only to its nickname.
你只有叫那孩子的外號，他才答應。
3.
負有責任，對…負責，為…的后果負責，須做交代，對…負責做出解釋，向…負責說明：
The directors had to answer to the stock holders for loss.
該損失董事們要向股東做出交代。
4.
與(描述等)相符，和…相合；像：
He answers to the description.
他與描述相符。
5.
適合于，符合：
That answers precisely to our need.
那正符合我們的需要。
6.
(飛機、船、汽車等)對…做出反應；聽從(使喚、控制)，服從：
The sails are not answering to our pull on the ropes.
我們拉繩風帆不聽使喚。
Text 4
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers’ duty to withhold immigrants’information.
[B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states’ interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states’ support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.
以上就是2013年考研英語一答案的全部內容，text1 在 2006年的電影《穿普拉達的女魔頭》中，梅麗爾·斯特里普扮演的米蘭達?普瑞斯特利指責她那毫無吸引 力的助理認為高級時裝并未感染到她。Priestly解釋了這些年來，助理毛衫的那種深藍色是如何從時尚秀場走向 百貨商店，又走向廉價服裝店的，無疑，這個窮女孩的衣服就是在那兒買的。內容來源于互聯網，信息真偽需自行辨別。如有侵權請聯系刪除。
